FAQ’s about Our Neighborhood Voices
- All
- Housing
- Initiative
- Lawsuits
- Legal System
- Local Control
- Politics
- State Bills
- Wall Street Profits Main Street Pays
No. State laws are now written to “streamline” the approval process. This means there is merely an application to your local building department, and the project will be administratively approved within a state-mandated timeframe.
If you attempt to file a lawsuit, your chances of winning are almost zero, and it will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Lawyers and the legal process aren’t cheap.
When a project approval is successful, the underlying laws remain in place. Even if the project is not approved, the underlying laws remain in place.
Lawsuits are draining. Some lawsuits are winners, others are losers. Ultimately, filing a lawsuit is often fruitless. When there is a win against a recently passed State law, the Legislators merely update the broken part.
Every lawsuit costs hundreds of thousands of dollars and fails; the money is better spent on a statewide initiative. Years of court decisions, court battles, anger, emotion, and time only allow for more State laws to be passed.
We need to build more of the RIGHT KIND of housing: the kind that’s affordable for middle, working, and lower income Californians.
Enabling developers to flood the market with market-rate and luxury housing, as recent legislation does, only creates more expensive housing that few Californians can afford. If dense, market-rate, and luxury multifamily buildings were the solution, places like Manhattan, London, Moscow, and Hong Kong would be the most affordable cities in the world, not the least.
In contrast to distant state regulators, local governments are best positioned to know where and how to incentivize housing their communities need and want.
Sacramento has failed. There are two main weapons in the assault on California’s neighborhoods: New laws and new regulations.
Sacramento lawmakers have passed over 400 laws in the last eight years alone, stripping away local control over development and allowing large developers to bypass nearly all local rules. That’s right — over 400 laws! These laws supersede the local authority almost entirely. There is literally nothing cities can do.
What have those 400 laws done?
Build luxury homes.
Under state law, in order to get on the ballot, we’ll need to obtain 874,641 valid petition signatures from registered California voters. Accounting for the signatures that will inevitably be rejected, we will need a total of 1.2 million signatures. Once we qualify for the ballot, we will begin our general election campaign to persuade Californians to vote to restore local voices in important land-use decisions.
Our efforts will require significant funding and a tremendous amount of volunteers. The process is long; it is not a sprint but a marathon.
We’ve tried. In the rare circumstance we won, they turned their backs on us. Sacramento is the proverbial snake-pit of back-room deals, scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. Both parties are complicit; the Democrats have the votes. The Republicans go along to get along or believe the narrative. Both parties have the monetary interests behind them
California is losing population, interest rates were at historic lows, Wall Street investment firms are buying homes, and Airbnb is converting existing homes into vacation rentals. The housing market is complicated; there is no silver bullet.
Who pays for the new infrastructure? The sewers? The Schools? The traffic impacts? According to the new state laws, not the new projects, the existing residents do.
Building housing and building affordable housing are two completely different market segments. How many of these state laws require actual, enforced, non-owner-occupied affordable housing? None.
The initiative was drafted to ensure compliance with relevant state environmental, fair housing, and anti-discrimination laws.
The initiative does not conflict with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Single-family neighborhoods are not inherently discriminatory, and many people of color own and rent homes in these neighborhoods that represent the main means of building wealth for them. Now that BIPOC single-family neighborhoods exist, Our Neighborhood Voices finds it ironic and disturbing that there is an effort to undermine and devalue the importance of single-family homes. These are the exact neighborhoods that are being targeted by these State laws.
The Our Neighborhood Voices (ONV) initiative (view/download draft PDF) restores the authority of your local representatives to decide what gets built in your community, on your street, and right next door to where you live. It will amend the California State Constitution, enshrining those decisions at the local level. Lawmakers have used state statutes, which trump local laws and regulations. The ONV initiative overrides state statutes with this Constitutional amendment.
ONV has received significant donations from individuals and organizations. The initiative is supported by a statewide grassroots coalition of Californians that includes Democrats, Republicans, Independents and voters from every part of the political spectrum, including more than 100 local elected officials. Our list of supporters includes some 20,000 Californians just like you. In short, ONV is building a statewide coalition of community advocates, elected officials, and Californians from all walks of life who agree that it is time to restore our voice on local community decisions.
The politicians in Sacramento are almost unanimously removing all ability of your local government to make the most basic decision about your community:
Parking requirements? Gone. They say you no longer need vehicles because you’ll be using mass-transportation.
Height, size, and type of buildings? Gone, here come the square, towering monsters.
Single-family homes? Illegal and no more. Replaced with an investor-owned fourplex.
Affordable housing? No, all market-rate or luxury housing to replace that older affordable housing unit for 2-3 times the price of the older unit.
Impact fees for Public Safety, Parks, sidewalk, and infrastructure? Gone. Current residents will pay for the impacts of the new developments.
These new projects are buying older, affordable housing units or converting current commercial parcels into high-density, unaffordable market-rate units. This leads to gentrification and economic displacement in working-class neighborhoods and communities of color.
No more California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or local input on projects. This “streamlining” results in projects with little to no oversight from your local governance or community. No more input, as here comes a cookie-cutter, square building looking directly into your private space.
Dozens of new State mandates and laws must be implemented quickly every year. None of these new mandates or laws has associated funding for implementation.
Wall Street profits, Main Street pays. Many of these State laws are literally written by Wall Street lobbyists. Who do you think profits? Who pays? Your community pays for the impacts, Wall Street profits.
Recent state laws let developers tear down the house right next door to you and build a multi-unit, multi-story building – and you have no say in the matter. You’ll be demonized as racist, exclusionary, anti-homeless, and worse. Under these new laws, developers don’t have to conduct environmental reviews, provide onsite parking, or build affordable housing. In fact, they don’t even have to tell you what’s coming. You’ll find out when the bulldozers show up next door on a Monday morning. These laws are blank checks to developers.
The ONV initiative is the strongest weapon we have to fight back against these draconian laws, because it will restore our ability – YOUR ability – to speak out and impact what is happening in our own communities. If you believe that we should have a voice in our own neighborhoods, JOIN US and/or Donate today!
One of the most pernicious lies the political establishment has spread is that anyone who cares about the future of their neighborhood automatically opposes new development, especially new affordable development.
This is the myth of the NIMBY, which stands for “not in my backyard.” Tellingly, the term was coined by corporate marketers in 1979 to smear residents in New Hampshire and Michigan who opposed the construction of new nuclear power plants in their communities (this was in the immediate aftermath of the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, when fears about the dangers of nuclear energy were at a peak). Big corporations used the term in the 1980s and 1990s to demonize people who opposed new landfills, prisons, oil refineries, and other industrial sites in their communities.
ONV leadership and supporters are not NIMBYs, nor are we about saying no. We support affordable housing in our communities. We support our neighborhoods to be as thriving and diverse as possible. We support every community to choose its own destiny. We support local choice, local control, and the local decision-making process.
We oppose top-down state mandates that make housing less affordable and remove local control on planning.